Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections.

Background: The long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin possess excellent microbiologic activity against gram-positive bacteria and provide prolonged tissue exposure at sites of infection. Moreover, these antibiotics are well tolerated and do not require therapeutic drug monitoring. Methods: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic experiments ascertained that one to two doses of these long-acting agents can provide an extended period (≥6 weeks) of antimicrobial therapy. Results: Clinical studies subsequently found that microbiologic and clinical response rates with these agents were comparable to standard antibiotic agents used in the treatment of bone and joint infections. In addition, pharmacoeconomic analyses have discovered cost savings with the use of these antimicrobial agents in the treatment of serious deep-seated bacterial infections. Conclusions: Thus, these long-acting lipoglycopeptides offer potential for cost-effective outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy of difficult to treat infections, such as osteomyelitis.

Monte Carlo Simulation Methodologies for ß-Lactam/ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Effect on Probability of Target Attainment Assessments.

Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) are used in antibiotic development to predict the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) for a dosing regimen. However, for ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL-BLICs), methods for linking simulated concentration profiles of the ß-lactam (BL) and ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) components are rarely described. Using a previously defined pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime/avibactam from critically ill patients, we performed four 5000-patient MCSs using different methods of increasing complexity to couple the BL and BLI components and compared PTA for ceftazidime and avibactam targets of >70% fT>MIC and >70% fT>1 mg/L, respectively, at MICs from 1 to 128 mg/L. Method A ignored all covariates and correlations, whereas methods B, C, and D enhanced associations by adding (B) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug only; (C) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug and creatinine clearance (CRCL); and (D) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug, CRCL, and pharmacokinetic parameter correlation between drugs. Method D produced a simulated patient population that best recapitulated the observed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters in actual patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam PTA at MIC 8 mg/L (the susceptibility break point) and 16 mg/L ranged from 92.4% to 98.3% and 80.2% to 88.4%, respectively. PTA was lowest with method A, whereas PTA estimates were similar for all other methods. Compared with ignoring all pharmacokinetic parameter associations, the inclusion of covariate relationships and parameter correlation between both components of ceftazidime/avibactam leads to fewer patients with discordant pharmacokinetic parameters and results in higher PTA. Consideration of these methodologies should guide future MCS analyses for BL-BLIC.

Plazomicin: A New Aminoglycoside.

Plazomicin (ACHN-490) is a novel parenteral aminoglycoside developed to target multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. It has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis caused by susceptible organisms. When compared with meropenem, plazomicin was not inferior. The adverse-event profile for plazomicin was comparable to meropenem except for an increased additional rise in serum creatinine in the plazomicin arm compared with the meropenem arm. This review focuses on the mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical indications, and safety profile of this drug. Considerations for formulary addition and its place in therapy are also discussed.

Delafloxacin: A New Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Fluoroquinolone.

Delafloxacin (ABT 492) is a new fluoroquinolone available in both oral and parenteral formulations. It has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. When compared to combination therapy of vancomycin and aztreonam, delafloxacin was not inferior and had a favorable adverse event profile. Furthermore, its anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity and favorable clinical response in MRSA infections distinguishes it from other fluoroquinolones. This review focuses on the mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical indications, and safety profile of this drug. Considerations for formulary addition and its place in therapy are also discussed.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics, especially the volume of distribution (Vd), of ß-lactam antibiotics can be altered in critically ill patients. This can lead to decreased serum concentrations and a reduction in clinical cures. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new antimicrobial agent utilized in critically ill patients although its pharmacokinetics has not been well defined in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, the serum concentrations of CZA from adult patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) with standard dosing regimens were measured and both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were computed. The pharmacodynamic analyses included Monte Carlo simulations to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA: free ceftazidime concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for 50% of the dosing interval; free avibactam concentrations exceed 1 mg/L over the dosing interval) and serum time-kill curves against multi-drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to CZA. Serum concentrations were measured in 10 critically ill patients at two, four, six, and eight hours after multiple doses (infused over two hours) of CZA. RESULTS: A significant linear relation between creatinine clearance and total body clearance was identified for both ceftazidime (R = 0.91) and avibactam (R = 0.88). The mean clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life for ceftazidime were 6.1 ± 3.8 L/h, 35 ± 10.5 L, and 4.8 ± 2.15 h, respectively. For avibactam, these values were 11.1 ± 6.8 L/h, 50.8 ± 14.3 L, and 4.1 ± 2.1 h, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam achieved optimal PTA for bacteria with MICs of 16 mg/L or less. Furthermore, time-kill experiments revealed that serum concentrations of CZA, at each collection time, exhibited bactericidal (≥ 3 log10 CFU/mL reduction) activity against each of the study isolates. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study results suggest that the current dosing regimens of CZA can provide effective antimicrobial activity in ICU patients against CZA-susceptible (MIC ≤8 mg/L) isolates.

Immunogenicity of 13-Valent Conjugate Pneumococcal Vaccine in Patients 50 Years and Older with End-Stage Renal Disease and on Dialysis.

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and on dialysis are at increased risk of pneumococcal disease. We evaluated the immunogenicity of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in this population. Eligible patients with ESRD and on dialysis were given a single dose of PCV13. The concentrations of serum antibodies against 13 pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides were measured at the baseline and at 2 and 12 months postvaccination. A response to the vaccine was defined as a ≥2-fold increase in antibody concentration from that at the baseline and an absolute postvaccination value of at least 1 µg/ml. Seventeen patients completed the study. Increases in the concentrations of antibodies to the vaccine serotype were demonstrated 2 months after vaccination. The geometric mean antibody concentrations at 12 months postvaccination declined by 38% to 72% compared to those measured at 2 months postvaccination. A response to at least 1 serotype in the vaccine was seen in all patients at both 2 and 12 months postvaccination. The overall rate of the response to each individual vaccine serotype varied between 23.5% and 94.1% at 2 months postvaccination and 23.5% and 65% at 12 months postvaccination. Pain at the injection site was the most common local reaction. Vaccination with PCV13 induces antibody responses to vaccine serotypes in patients with ESRD and on dialysis at 2 months postvaccination. However, the decline in antibody concentrations at 12 months postvaccination with a conjugate pneumococcal vaccine requires further study. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01974817.).

Profile of oritavancin and its potential in the treatment of acute bacterial skin structure infections.

Oritavancin, a semisynthetic derivative of the glycopeptide antibiotic chloroeremomycin, received the US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by susceptible Gram-positive bacteria in adults in August 2014. This novel second-generation semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antibiotic has activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Oritavancin inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis and is rapidly bactericidal against many Gram-positive pathogens. The long half-life of this drug enables a single-dose administration. Oritavancin is not metabolized in the body, and the unchanged drug is slowly excreted by the kidneys. In two large Phase III randomized, double-blind, clinical trials, oritavancin was found to be non-inferior to vancomycin in achieving the primary composite end point in the treatment of acute Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections. Adverse effects noted were mostly mild with nausea, headache, and vomiting being the most common reported side effects. Oritavancin has emerged as another useful antimicrobial agent for treatment of acute Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections, including those caused by MRSA and VISA.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftaroline prophylaxis in patients with external ventricular drains.

BACKGROUND: Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against drug-resistant bacteria, including strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and may be useful to prevent and treat ventriculostomy-related infections (VRIs). The purpose of this study was to analyze the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prophylactic ceftaroline in neurosurgical patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD). METHODS: Adult patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit with an EVD were given prolonged prophylaxis with ceftaroline. Serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) were obtained simultaneously at 2, 6, and 12 h after initiation of the fourth dose of ceftaroline and concentrations were measured by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. Time-kill curves against isolates of coagulase-negative S. aureus, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MRSA, and Streptococcus pneumoniae were determined in serum and CSF at each collection time point. RESULTS: A total of five patients with a mean age of 63 y and mean weight of 83 kg were enrolled. The mean CSF:serum penetration ratios of ceftaroline were 0.005 (0.5%), 0.021 (2.1%), and 0.043 (4.3%) at 2, 6, and 12 h, respectively. The mean ceftaroline exposure ratio area under the curve (AUC)csf/AUCserum) was 0.011 (1.1%). Bactericidal activity at each collection time point was observed against each strain of staphylococci from serum samples and a penicillin-sensitive strain of S. pneumoniae from CSF samples. CONCLUSION: This investigation suggests that ceftaroline could have clinical utility for the prevention of VRIs in patients with EVDs.

Oritavancin: A Long-Half-Life Lipoglycopeptide.

Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that has been shown to be effective for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). This antibiotic has multiple mechanisms of action including inhibiting peptidoglycan cell wall synthesis and disrupting bacterial cell membrane, leading to cell death. Oritavancin is highly active against common gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The drug is administered as a single intravenous dose of 1200 mg over 3 hours in adult patients, and because of its terminal half-life of 393 hours, repeat dosing is not required in the treatment of ABSSIs. There is a very slow elimination from tissue sites, and no dosing adjustments are required for renal or hepatic insufficiency. Two clinical trials have demonstrated noninferiority compared with vancomycin in the treatment of ABSSSIs. Other than liver enzyme elevation and the occurrence of osteomyelitis, oritavancin has been associated with adverse events similar to those of vancomycin in follow-up for up to 60 days. Patients should be monitored for osteomyelitis and alternate therapy given in the case of confirmed or suspected osteomyelitis. Although oritavancin is an attractive antibiotic to consider in the outpatient area, its efficacy and safety in the treatment of other sites of infection are yet to be established.

Higher clinical success in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with linezolid compared with vancomycin: results from the IMPACT-HAP study.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical success of linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with MRSA VAP. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients with VAP (defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) due to MRSA who were treated with linezolid or vancomycin. MRSA VAP was considered when MRSA was isolated from a tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage. Clinical success was evaluated by assessing improvement or resolution of signs and symptoms of VAP by day 14. After matching on confounding factors, logistic regression models were used to determine if an association existed between treatment arm and clinical success. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were evaluated (101 treated with linezolid and 87 with vancomycin). The mean ± standard deviation Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 21 ± 11 for linezolid- and 19 ± 9 for vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.041). Clinical success occurred in 85% of linezolid-treated patients compared with 69% of vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.009). After adjusting for confounding factors, linezolid-treated patients were 24% more likely to experience clinical success than vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the evidence indicating that patients with MRSA VAP who are treated with linezolid are more likely to respond favorably compared with patients treated with vancomycin.

Tissue penetration and antimicrobial activity of standard- and high-dose trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and linezolid in patients with diabetic foot infection.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to conduct a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of high (320/1600 mg) and standard (160/800 mg) doses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and linezolid in outpatients with mild diabetic foot infections (DFIs). METHODS: Both viable skin/soft tissue from the infection site and serum were obtained at various times after antibiotic administration from 18 patients (6 per study group) being treated with linezolid, standard doses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or high doses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole during a follow-up clinic visit. These samples were assayed for drug concentrations by liquid chromatography in tandem with mass spectrometry. Patient sera were also utilized in time-kill assays against two strains of Staphylococcus aureus and three strains of ß-haemolytic streptococci. RESULTS: The mean tissue/serum ratio for linezolid was 0.46 (range, 0.18-0.71). The mean tissue/serum ratio for trimethoprim was 1.2 (range, 0.3-4.5) for both standard and high doses, and 0.23 (range, 0.1-0.46) and 0.36 (range, 0.14-1.28) for standard and high doses of sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Linezolid exhibited inhibitory activity in time-kill assays against strains of S. aureus (0.45 ± 0.5 log10 cfu/mL) and ß-haemolytic streptococci (2.2 ± 0.6 log10 cfu/mL), while trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exhibited bactericidal (>3 log kill) activity against all of these isolates. These findings were consistent for each sampling time and for high as well as standard doses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study found that trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exhibits good skin/soft tissue penetration in patients with DFIs as well as bactericidal activity in serum against strains of S. aureus and ß-haemolytic streptococci.

Tigecycline: an update.

Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with activity against difficult-to-treat pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Gram-negative bacterial strains that produce extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Minimal organ toxicity and lack of dosage adjustment in most patients are important considerations for tigecycline use. Tigecycline has been shown to be as effective and safe as standard antimicrobial therapy for treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated skin and skin structure infections, and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. The clearest applications of tigecycline are for on-label indications. Whether tigecycline should be utilized as therapy for other infections including hospital-acquired infections with a high likelihood of multidrug-resistant pathogens is a complex issue that requires ongoing assessment. This article offers an updated overview of tigecycline clinical studies, current microbial resistance patterns, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigations, and safety analyses.

Pharmacokinetics and monte carlo simulations of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Doripenem is a group 2 carbapenem with enhanced in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There is a paucity of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data on doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 doses of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and provide probability estimates of attaining effective drug exposure against common gram-negative pathogens. METHODS: We obtained multiple blood samples from 12 adults with febrile neutropenia who were receiving either 500 mg or 1000 mg of intravenous doripenem over 4 hours every 8 hours. Following at least 2 doses, serum concentrations were measured in each subject at 1, 4, 6, and 8 hours after initiation of a dose by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The derived pharmacokinetic parameters from these serum levels were used to perform a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation against bacteria with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.008-64 mg/L to determine probability estimates of the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT(>MIC)). RESULTS: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters in these patients were a volume of distribution of 43.9 L, an elimination rate constant of 0.37 h(-1), a total clearance of 14.4 L/h, and an area under the concentration-time curve of 57.6 mg•h/L. An optimal probability of target attainment (40% fT(>MIC)) of 90% was obtained against bacteria with MICs ≤2 mg/L and ≤4 mg/L with 500-mg and 1000-mg doses, respectively. Adverse events associated with doripenem were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this analysis of doripenem suggest that higher doses, as well as prolonged infusions, may be necessary to optimally treat selected gram-negative bacteria (eg, P. aeruginosa) in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Summary of ceftaroline fosamil clinical trial studies and clinical safety.

In October 2010, the new cephalosporin, ceftaroline fosamil, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for therapy of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). The active metabolite, ceftaroline, demonstrates in vitro activity against typical bacterial pathogens most often associated with CABP or ABSSSIs, including resistant Gram-positive pathogens such as multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil was assessed in 2 large phase 3 programs of randomized, double-blind, clinical trials for CABP and ABSSSIs. For both indications, therapy with ceftaroline fosamil was observed to be noninferior to the comparator agents (ceftriaxone for CABP and vancomycin plus aztreonam for ABSSSIs) at both a standard test of cure assessment time (8-15 days after discontinuation of study drug) and an early assessment time point (day 3 or 4 of study). In the integrated analysis of the trials for CABP (FOCUS 1 and 2), clinical cure rates for the ceftaroline group were numerically higher than those for the ceftriaxone group (for the clinically evaluable population 84.3% vs 77.7%; difference: 6.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.6%-11.8%). Among patients with CABP caused by S. pneumoniae, clinical cure rates were markedly higher in the ceftaroline treatment group than in the ceftriaxone treatment group (59 of 69 [85.5%] vs 48 of 70 [68.6%], respectively). For the ABSSSI studies (CANVAS 1 and 2), microbiologically evaluable (ME) success rates were similar between the treatment groups. Notably, the clinical cure rates in ME patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus ABSSSIs were 142 of 152 (93.4%) and 115 of 122 (94.3%), for ceftaroline and vancomycin plus aztreonam, respectively, and did not differ from those achieved in infections due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (93.0%-94.5%). Ceftaroline fosamil was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to the comparator agents used in these phase 3 trials.

Tigecycline penetration into skin and soft tissue.

BACKGROUND: Tigecycline, a derivative of minocycline, has antibacterial activity against common pathogens associated with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. At present, there is a paucity of data concerning its penetration into skin and soft tissue (SST). METHODS: This study evaluated the penetration of tigecycline into SST in 25 patients (mean age, 52 years) with cSSTIs requiring surgical intervention. After a 100-mg loading dose, each patient received 50 mg of tigecycline infused intravenously over 1 h every 12 h. Blood samples were obtained on the day of surgery at 1 h (peak), during surgery, and 12 h (trough) after the beginning of a 50-mg infusion. A viable SST sample was harvested at the infection site. Tissue and concomitant serum concentrations were grouped into three time intervals: 2-4 h (median, 3 h), 5-7 h (median, 7 h), and 8-10 h (median, 9h), and analyzed for tissue penetration. RESULTS: Tissue and blood samples were obtained one to six days (mean 2.5 days) after initiation of tigecycline treatment. The mean serum peak and trough concentrations of tigecycline were 0.56±0.25 mg/L and 0.26±0.12 mg/L, respectively. The mean tissue:serum ratios at the three study time periods were 3.8 (range 0.7-5.5), 5.2 (range 0.8-7.1), and 2.8 (range 0.8-8.8). CONCLUSIONS: In general, we found higher concentrations of tigecycline in SST than in the serum at the same time point.

Ceftaroline: a novel cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Ceftaroline (PPI 0903, formerly TAK-599), the active metabolite of a N-phosphono prodrug, ceftaroline fosamil, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. This antimicrobial agent binds to penicillin binding proteins (PBP) inhibiting cell wall synthesis and has a high affinity for PBP2a, which is associated with methicillin resistance. Ceftaroline is consistently active against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate, linezolid-resistant, and daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains. It possesses variable activity against Enterobacteriaceae and good activity against oral anaerobes. The drug is usually administrated intravenously at 600 mg every 12 h. Ceftaroline has low protein binding and is excreted by the kidneys and thus requires dose adjustments in individuals with renal failure. Clinical trials have demonstrated noninferiority when compared with vancomycin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and noninferiority when compared with ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Ceftaroline demonstrated a safety profile similar to that of comparator drugs in clinical trials.

Therapeutic options for diabetic foot infections: a review with an emphasis on tissue penetration characteristics.

Foot complications are common in diabetic patients; foot ulcers are among the more serious consequences. These ulcers frequently become infected, and if not treated promptly and appropriately, diabetic foot infections can lead to septic gangrene and amputation. Foot infections may be classified as mild, moderate, or severe; this largely determines the approach to therapy. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen in these infections, and the increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant S aureus during the past two decades has further complicated antibiotic treatment. Chronic infections are often polymicrobial. Physiologic changes, and local and systemic inflammation, can affect the plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents in diabetic patients, leading to impaired target-site penetration. Knowledge of the serum and tissue concentrations of antibiotics in diabetic patients is, therefore, important for choosing the optimal drug and dose. This article reviews the commonly used therapeutic options for treatment, including many newer antibiotics developed to target multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria, and includes available data relating specifically to the tissue penetration of these agents.

The importance of tissue penetration in achieving successful antimicrobial treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: vancomycin and linezolid.

BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the recent emergence of community-associated MRSA are major clinical, public health, and economic challenges. MRSA is a leading cause of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTI). Vancomycin and linezolid are two commonly used antimicrobial agents with activity against Gram-positive pathogens, particularly MRSA, that are used to treat both nosocomial pneumonia and cSSTI. Recently, the therapeutic efficacy of vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with MRSA infections has been questioned due to the emergence of MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin together with concerns related to inadequate dosing and poor tissue penetration of the drug. SCOPE: A literature review was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pulmonary and tissue penetration of vancomycin and linezolid. Using MEDLINE and EMBASE, the most relevant articles in English published over the past 25 years (up to October 2008) were identified and summarized. Studies in human volunteers and adult patients that measured concentrations of antibiotic in serum, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and tissue were selected for further review. FINDINGS: For both drugs, pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in diverse patient populations and employed varying techniques to measure tissue concentrations. Vancomycin concentrations in ELF ranged from 5 to 25% of simultaneous plasma levels, while concentrations in whole homogenized lung tissue were slightly higher (24-41%). Distribution of vancomycin into soft tissue was variable. For linezolid, overall mean concentrations in ELF and in soft tissue were generally similar or higher than simultaneous plasma levels, although variability in tissue penetration across studies in healthy volunteers and patients was seen. LIMITATIONS: The studies included in this review vary greatly in their designs and patient populations; this, together with methodologic difficulties, limits the interpretation of the data. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of clinical data correlating ELF concentrations and clinical outcome, the clinical significance of differences in pulmonary penetration of vancomycin and linezolid is unknown. Higher vancomycin serum concentrations may be necessary to achieve appropriate lung concentrations to optimize treatment outcomes. Linezolid demonstrates adequate penetration into lung and other soft issues with sustained concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens, including MRSA, for the majority of the dosing interval. Examination of the pharmacokinetic data adds insights not provided by the clinical trial data and together provides clinicians with a more comprehensive basis for selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of serious MRSA infections.

Telavancin: a novel lipoglycopeptide.

Telavancin, a derivative of vancomycin, is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that has been shown to be effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections. It has also been effective in the treatment of gram-positive pneumonia. This antibiotic has a dual mechanism of action by inhibiting peptidoglycan synthesis and causing membrane depolarization. Telavancin is consistently active against Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, linezolid-resistant S. aureus, and daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains. The drug is usually administrated intravenously at 10 mg/kg every 24 h. Telavancin is excreted by the kidneys, and thus, dosage adjustments are required in cases of renal failure. Clinical trials have demonstrated non-inferiority, compared with vancomycin, in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and pneumonia. Telavancin is associated with higher rates of renal events, altered taste, nausea, and vomiting but lesser rates of pruritus and infusion-related events, compared with vancomycin.